Nursing
Create a 5-7 slide PowerPoint presentation about an evidence-based population health improvement plan.
Introduction
Master’s-level nurses need to be able to think critically about the evidence, outcomes data, and other relevant information they encounter throughout their daily practice. Often the evidence or information that a nurse encounters, researches, or studies is not presented in the exact context of that nurse’s practice. A key skill of the master’s-level nurse is to transfer evidence from the context in which it was presented and apply it to a different context in order to maximize the benefit to patients in that new context.
Professional Context
Master’s-level nurses need to be able to think beyond the bedside. It is important to research, synthesize, and apply evidence that will result in improved health outcomes for the communities and populations that are part of your care setting. Improving outcomes at a community or population level, even incrementally, can create noticeably significant, aggregate health improvements for patients across all of a care setting.
Scenario
Your organization has created an initiative to improve one of the pervasive and chronic health concerns in the community. Some examples of possibilities for health improvement initiatives include type 2 diabetes, HIV, obesity, and communicable diseases. You will need to do your own research to gather and evaluate the relevant data for your chosen issue.
Once you have created a presentation for the initiative, you have been asked to present to a group of community stakeholders. The purpose of your presentation is to inform and enlist support for the initiative from your audience.
Instructions
The suggested headings for your presentation are:
· Community Data Evaluation.
· Meeting Community Needs.
· Measuring Outcomes.
· Communication Plan.
· Evidence.
In your presentation, you will:
· Evaluate the environmental and epidemiological data about your community so that you can determine a population health issue within a chosen community.
. Identify the relevant data. This can be communicated in a table or chart.
. Describe the major population health issue suggested by the data within your community.
. Explain how environmental factors affect the health of community residents.
. Identify the level of evidence, validity, and reliability for each source.
· Develop an ethical health improvement plan with outcome criteria that addresses the population health issue that you identified in your evaluation.
. Consider the environmental realities and challenges existing in the community.
. Include interventions that will meet community needs.
. Address potential barriers or misunderstandings related to various cultures prevalent in the community.
. Propose criteria that can be used to evaluate the achievement of the plan’s outcomes for your population health improvement.
. Explain why your proposed criteria are appropriate and useful measures of success.
· Explain how you plan to apply strategies for communicating with community stakeholders and community members in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way about the development and administering of your population health improvement plan.
. Identify the community stakeholders that are relevant to your Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan.
. Develop a clear communication strategy that is mindful of the cultural and ethical expectations of colleagues and community members regarding data privacy.
. Ensure that your strategy enables you to make complex medical terms and concepts understandable to members of the community regardless of disabilities, language, or level of education.
· Explain the value and relevance of the resources you used as the basis for your population health improvement plan.
. Explain why the evidence is valuable and relevant to the community health concern you are addressing.
. Explain why each piece of evidence is appropriate and informs the goal of improving the health of the community.
· Communicate the Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan in a professional, effective manner that encourages the community stakeholders to implement and sustain change.
· Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.
Submission Requirements
· Length of submission: 5–7 slides. Balance text with visuals. Avoid text-heavy slides. Use speaker’s notes for additional content.
· Font and font size: Appropriate size and weight for a presentation, generally 24–28 points for headings; no smaller than 18 points for bullet-point text. Use a suitable professional typeface, such as Times or Arial, throughout the presentation.
· Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3–5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your evaluation, recommendations, and plans. Current source material is defined as no older than five years unless it is a seminal work.
· APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
· Competency 2: Apply evidence-based practice to design interventions to improve population health.
. Evaluate the environmental and epidemiological data about a community to determine a population health issue.
Competency 3: Evaluate outcomes of evidence-based interventions.
. Develop an ethical health improvement plan with outcome criteria that addresses the population health issue identified in the evaluation.
. Explain the value and relevance of the resources used as the basis of a population health improvement plan.
Competency 5: Synthesize evidence-based practice and academic research to communicate effective solutions.
. Explain a plan to apply strategies for communicating with community stakeholders and community members in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way about the development and implementation of the population health improvement plan.
. Communicate the Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan in a professional, effective manner that engages the community stakeholders to implement and sustain change.
. Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.
Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan: Assessment 2:
Add the Title of the Population Health Improvement Initiative
Add your name
NURS-FPX60
1
1
Add the Date
1
Community Data Evaluation
Environmental & Epidemiological Data
Prevalent Population Health Concerns
Environmental Factors
2
Remember you are looking at a specific issue in the community that is affecting a population health concern.
Describe the major population health issue suggested by the data within your community.
Explain how environmental factors affect the health of community residents.
Identify the level of evidence, validity, and reliability for each source.
2
Community Data
Diabetes Prevalence a b c d 8.1999999999999993 3.2 1.4 1.2
Meeting Community Needs
Population Health Improvement Plan
Potential Barriers:
3
Consider the environmental realities and challenges existing in the community.
Include interventions that will meet community needs.
Address potential barriers or misunderstandings related to various cultures prevalent in the community.
3
Measuring Outcomes
Outcome Criteria that will be Evaluated
4
Explain why your proposed criteria are appropriate and useful measures of success.
4
Communication Plan
Community Stakeholders
Communication Strategy
5
Identify the community stakeholders that are relevant to your Population Health Improvement Plan.
Develop a clear communication strategy mindful of the cultural and ethical expectations of colleagues and community members regarding data privacy.
Ensure that your strategy enables you to make complex medical terms and concepts understandable to members of the community, regardless of language, disabilities, or level of education.
5
Value & Relevance of Evidence
Relevance and Value to Community Health Concern:
Resource Alignment to Health Improvement Plan:
6
Explain why the evidence is valuable and relevant to the community health concern you are addressing.
Explain why each piece of evidence is appropriate and informs the goal of improving the health of the community.
6
References
Add the references here
7
7
Select your paper details and see how much our professional writing services will cost.
Our custom human-written papers from top essay writers are always free from plagiarism.
Your data and payment info stay secured every time you get our help from an essay writer.
Your money is safe with us. If your plans change, you can get it sent back to your card.
We offer more than just hand-crafted papers customized for you. Here are more of our greatest perks.
Get instant answers to the questions that students ask most often.
See full FAQWe complete each paper from scratch, and in order to make you feel safe regarding its authenticity, we check our content for plagiarism before its delivery. To do that, we use our in-house software, which can find not only copy-pasted fragments, but even paraphrased pieces of text. Unlike popular plagiarism-detection systems, which are used by most universities (e.g. Turnitin.com), we do not report to any public databases—therefore, such checking is safe.
We provide a plagiarism-free guarantee that ensures your paper is always checked for its uniqueness. Please note that it is possible for a writing company to guarantee an absence of plagiarism against open Internet sources and a number of certain databases, but there is no technology (except for turnitin.com itself) that could guarantee no plagiarism against all sources that are indexed by turnitin. If you want to be 100% sure of your paper’s originality, we suggest you check it using the WriteCheck service from turnitin.com and send us the report.
Yes. You can have a free revision during 7 days after you’ve approved the paper. To apply for a free revision, please press the revision request button on your personal order page. You can also apply for another writer to make a revision of your paper, but in such a case, we can ask you for an additional 12 hours, as we might need some time to find another writer to work on your order.
After the 7-day period, free revisions become unavailable, and we will be able to propose only the paid option of a minor or major revision of your paper. These options are mentioned on your personal order page.