annotated bibliography

will  construct an annotated bibliography based upon your sport of choice.  This Annotated Bibliography will be sport specific and contain books,  articles, websites, etc that are relevant to your sport’s origins and history. 

Purpose:  An annotated bibliography is an organizing tool that is helpful when  working on a research project. An effective annotated bibliography is  used to compile research sources in one location and provide the  researcher with quick access to the information contained in each  source. 

Audience:  This assignment should be directed at your scholarly peers, and you may  assume that they have only a casual familiarity with your topic or  issue.

Content/Subject:  Your annotated bibliography will consist of the sources that you have  deemed relevant to your topic and/or question(s) of inquiry. The goal of  the assignment each week is to find Primary Sources. While you may  encounter sources that are secondary, you will only include the ones  that you find most useful and relevant. 

• Title Page:  Include – Date, Course Name and Number, Instructor’s Name, Assignment  Name and Number, Your Primary Sport you will be using in class.
• New page, Title Heading ” Summary of search process “:  Key words, Key phrases, Search engines within our Library, etc. Explain  why you chose your sport, and what you learned about your sport’s origins and history from this assignment.
• New page, Title Heading ” Annotated Bibliography ” in APA level one heading. Begin your Annotated Bibliography on this page. follow the Formatting instructions below.

• provide 2 additional sources of various types (book, article, website, etc.).
• Sources should be focused around a narrowed issue or question of inquiry (topic for the week and your chosen sport).

Full Title of Annotated Bibliography

Student’s Name

Primary Sport

SPMT501

Instructor’s Name

January 27, 2022

Summary of Search Process

In this section you will present your summary of the search process. Watch the attached video, to the Week 1 Assignment, for detailed information on what is expected in this section. Elements to consider are; Key words, Key phrases, Search engines within our Library, etc. Explain the required elements in the assignment instructions, layout, item number 2. Keep in mind, this is for your benefit. You will use these sources in future courses. If you know what terms you used to locate valid articles that interest you, you can more quickly locate articles for referencing on specific topics.

Full Title of Annotated Bibliography

Field, J. (2003).
Social capital. Routledge.

In this section, you will be writing the annotation for the source you have cited above. An annotated bibliography can simply describe the source (summary annotation) or it can also include an evaluation (evaluative annotation). For summary annotations, briefly write about the source. Focus on describing your source, such as the author’s qualifications and why was the source created. Describe the main ideas, arguments, themes, theses, or methodology, and identify the intended audience of the cited source Explain the author’s expertise, point of view, and any bias he or she may have about the topic.

Freeman, R.E. & Auster, E.R. (2011). Values, authenticity, and responsible leadership.
Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1022-7

Evaluative annotations include both a short description and your evaluation of the cited source. In your evaluation, critically assess the selected source for accuracy, relevance, and quality. Compare to other sources on the same topic that you have also cited to show similarities and differences. Explain why each source is useful for your research topic and how it relates to your topic. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the source. Identify the observations or conclusions of the author.

Maak, T. (2007). Responsible leadership, stakeholder engagement, and the emergence of social capital.
Journal of Business Ethics, 7, 329-343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9510-5

This is an example of a summary annotation. This article focuses on the role of social capital in responsible leadership. It looks at both the social networks that a leader builds within an organization, and the links that a leader creates with external stakeholders. Maak’s main aim with this article seems to be to persuade people of the importance of continued research into the abilities that a leader requires and how they can be acquired.

Maak, T. (2007). Responsible leadership, stakeholder engagement, and the emergence of social capital.
Journal of Business Ethics, 7, 329-343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9510-5

This is an example of an evaluative annotation. This article focuses on the role of social capital in responsible leadership. It looks at both the social networks that a leader builds within an organization, and the links that a leader creates with external stakeholders. Maak’s main aim with this article seems to be to persuade people of the importance of continued research into the abilities that a leader requires and how they can be acquired.

The focus on the world of multinational business means that for readers outside this world many of the conclusions seem rather obvious (be part of the solution not part of the problem). In spite of this, the article provides useful background information on the topic of responsible leadership and definitions of social capital which are relevant to an analysis of a public servant.