APA, format

CLC – Quality Models – Rubric

Description of Each Model 12 points

Criteria Description

Description of Each Model

5. Target 12 points

A description of each quality model is present and thorough.

4. Acceptable 11.04 points

A description of each quality model is present and detailed.

3. Approaching 10.56 points

A description of each quality model is present.

2. Insufficient 9.6 points

A description of each quality model is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

A description of each quality model is not present.

Brief History of Each Model 13 points

Criteria Description

Brief History of Each Model

5. Target 13 points

A brief history of each quality model is present and thorough.

4. Acceptable 11.96 points

A brief history of each quality model is present and detailed.

3. Approaching 11.44 points

A brief history of each quality model is present.

Collapse All

2. Insufficient 10.4 points

A brief history of each quality model is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

A brief history of each quality model is not present.

A description and examples of how each quality model Can be Applied to

the Health

Care Setting

15 points

Criteria Description

A description and examples of how each quality model Can be Applied to the Health

Care Setting

5. Target 15 points

A description and examples of how each quality model can be applied to the health

care setting is present and thorough.

4. Acceptable 13.8 points

A description and examples of how each quality model can be applied to the health

care setting is present and detailed.

3. Approaching 13.2 points

A description and examples of how each quality model can be applied to the health

care setting is present.

2. Insufficient 12 points

A description and examples of how each quality model can be applied to the health

care setting is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.

Presentation of Content 30 points

Criteria Description

Presentation of Content

5. Target 30 points

The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to

each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers.

The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

4. Acceptable 27.6 points

The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting

information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive

information from reliable sources.

3. Approaching 26.4 points

The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some

inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other.

2. Insufficient 24 points

The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong

sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information Includes

Layout 10 points

Criteria Description

Layout

5. Target 10 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with

appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in

length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance

the readability of the text.

4. Acceptable 9.2 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to

be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for

headings and text.

3. Approaching 8.8 points

The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the

fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long

paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.

2. Insufficient 8 points

The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting

with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is

difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy

background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.

f

Language Use and Audience Awareness 10 points

Criteria Description

Includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.

5. Target 10 points

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word

choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline,

and scope.

4. Acceptable 9.2 points

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for

the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.

3. Approaching 8.8 points

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.

2. Insufficient 8 points

Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are

present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech

appropriately.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer

Mechanics of Writing 5 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use

5. Target 5 points

Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.

4. Acceptable 4.6 points

Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.

3. Approaching 4.4 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to

the reader.

2. Insufficient 4 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

Documentation of Sources 5 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as

appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Target 5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment

and style, and format is free of error.

4. Acceptable 4.6 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is

mostly correct.

3. Approaching 4.4 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some

formatting errors may be present.

2. Insufficient 4 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to

assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Total 100 points

CLC – Quality Models

Start Date & Time

Jan 10 2023, 12:00 AM

Status

Upcoming

Rubric

View Rubric

Assessment Traits

Group

Assessment Description

This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment.

The purpose of this assignment is to examine quality models used in health care. With your CLC group, create a 12-15 slide PowerPoint on Lean, Six Sigma, and 5S quality models. Include the following in your presentation:

1. A description of each quality model.

2. A brief history of each quality model.

3. A description and examples of how each quality model can be applied to the health care setting.

4. Include a title slide, references slide, and comprehensive speaker notes.

5. Use a minimum of four peer-reviewed, scholarly references as evidence.

Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.