Develop a post in response to the discussion question chosen. Post must contain 400–500 original words and adhere to the following: Include an analysis, synthesis, and evaluation of the topic. Include a reference and in-text citations for the course textbook. Include a reference and in-text citations for at least one article from a peer-reviewed journal, published within the past five years. Include a reference and in-text citations for the Bible. Include an assessment/analysis of your Christian worldview as it relates to the topic. Include both in-text citations and references in APA format. Utilize correct English, grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Include clear topic sentences for each paragraph, supporting sentences, and a conclusion sentence/paragraph.
QUESTION CHOSEN: Research by David Kolb and others suggests that individuals have different learning styles. How would a manager who has a convergent learning style and a manager who has a divergent learning style differ in their approach to learning? Suppose you are going to conduct training sessions designed to teach managers how to give feedback to subordinates. These 2 managers are scheduled to participate. What might you do (if anything) to handle their style differences to ensure that both of them learn the material you present?
GRADING RUBRIC ATTACHED
Criteria Ratings Points
Thread: Key
Components
10 to >9.
0 pts
Advanced
All key components
of the Discussion are
answered in the
thread.
9 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
Most key components
of the Discussion are
answered in the
thread.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Some key
components of the
Discussion are
answered in the
thread.
0 pts
Not Present
No key components
of the Discussion are
answered in the
thread.
10 pts
Thread:
Clear,
logical flow
to post
5 to >4.0 pts
Advanced
A clear, logical flow is
present throughout all
of the thread.
4 to >3.0 pts
Proficient
A clear, logical flow is
present throughout
most of the thread.
3 to >0.0 pts
Developing
A clear, logical flow is
present in some of
the thread.
0 pts
Not Present
A clear, logical flow is
not present in the
thread.
5 pts
Thread:
Support for
major points
23 to >20.0 pts
Advanced
Major points are
supported by all of
the following:
• Textbook, with
in-text citations and
references; and • At
least one article from
a peer-reviewed
journal, with in-text
citations and
references; and
• The Bible, with
in-text citations and
references; and
• Good examples
(pertinent,
conceptual, or
personal examples
are acceptable); and
• Thoughtful
analysis, synthesis,
and evaluation of the
topic.
20 to >18.0 pts
Proficient
Major points are
supported by most of
the following:
• Textbook, with
in-text citations and
references; and • At
least one article from
a peer-reviewed
journal, with in-text
citations and
references; and
• The Bible, with
in-text citations and
references; and
• Good examples
(pertinent,
conceptual, or
personal examples
are acceptable); and
• Thoughtful analysis,
synthesis, and
evaluation of the
topic.
18 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Major points are
supported by some of
the following:
• Textbook, with
in-text citations and
references; and • At
least one article from
a peer-reviewed
journal, with in-text
citations and
references; and
• The Bible, with
in-text citations and
references; and
• Good examples
(pertinent,
conceptual, or
personal examples
are acceptable); and
• Thoughtful analysis,
synthesis, and
evaluation of the
topic.
0 pts
Not Present
Major points are
supported by none of
the following:
• Textbook, with
in-text citations and
references; and • At
least one article from
a peer-reviewed
journal, with in-text
citations and
references; and
• The Bible, with
in-text citations and
references; and
• Good examples
(pertinent,
conceptual, or
personal examples
are acceptable); and
• Thoughtful analysis,
synthesis, and
evaluation of the
topic.
2
3 pts
Discussion Grading Rubric | BUSI644_B02_202320
Criteria Ratings Points
Replies:
Support for
major points
14 to >12.0 pts
Advanced
Major points are
supported by all of
the following:
• Textbook, with
in-text citations and
references; and • At
least one article from
a peer-reviewed
journal, with in-text
citations and
references; and
• The Bible, with
in-text citations and
references; and
• Good examples
(pertinent,
conceptual, or
personal examples
are acceptable); and
• Thoughtful
analysis, synthesis,
and evaluation of the
topic.
12 to >11.0 pts
Proficient
Major points are
supported by most of
the following:
• Textbook, with
in-text citations and
references; and • At
least one article from
a peer-reviewed
journal, with in-text
citations and
references; and
• The Bible, with
in-text citations and
references; and
• Good examples
(pertinent,
conceptual, or
personal examples
are acceptable); and
• Thoughtful analysis,
synthesis, and
evaluation of the
topic.
1
1 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Major points are
supported by some of
the following:
• Textbook, with
in-text citations and
references; and • At
least one article from
a peer-reviewed
journal, with in-text
citations and
references; and
• The Bible, with
in-text citations and
references; and
• Good examples
(pertinent,
conceptual, or
personal examples
are acceptable); and
• Thoughtful analysis,
synthesis, and
evaluation of the
topic.
0 pts
Not Present
Major points are
supported by none of
the following:
• Textbook, with
in-text citations and
references; and • At
least one article from
a peer-reviewed
journal, with in-text
citations and
references; and
• The Bible, with
in-text citations and
references; and
• Good examples
(pertinent,
conceptual, or
personal examples
are acceptable); and
• Thoughtful analysis,
synthesis, and
evaluation of the
topic.
14 pts
Replies:
Clear topic
sentences
3 to >2.0 pts
Advanced
A clear topic
sentence for each
paragraph,
supporting
sentences, and a
conclusion
sentence/paragraph
is present throughout
all of the reply.
2 to >1.0 pts
Proficient
A clear topic
sentence for each
paragraph, supporting
sentences, and a
conclusion
sentence/paragraph
is present throughout
most of the reply.
1 to >0.0 pts
Developing
A clear topic
sentence for each
paragraph, supporting
sentences, and a
conclusion
sentence/paragraph
is present throughout
some of the reply.
0 pts
Not Present
A clear topic
sentence for each
paragraph, supporting
sentences, or a
conclusion
sentence/paragraph
is not present in the
thread
3 pts
Thread: APA
Format
7 to >6.0 pts
Advanced
All in-text citations
and references are
typed in APA format.
Zero errors are
present.
6 to >5.0 pts
Proficient
Between 1 – 2 APA
formatting errors are
present.
5 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Between 3 – 4 APA
formatting errors are
present.
0 pts
Not Present
More than 4 APA
formatting errors are
present; or APA
format was not
followed.
7 pts
Discussion Grading Rubric | BUSI644_B02_202320
Criteria Ratings Points
Thread:
Word Count
5 to >4.0 pts
Advanced
The thread is at least
400 original words in
length.
4 to >3.0 pts
Proficient
The thread is at least
350 original words in
length.
3 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The thread is at least
300 original words in
length.
0 pts
Not Present
The thread is less
than 300 original
words in length.
5 pts
Thread:
Spelling and
Grammar
5 to >4.0 pts
Advanced
Correct spelling,
grammar, and
punctuation are used.
4 to >3.0 pts
Proficient
Between 1–2 spelling,
grammar, and
punctuation errors are
present.
3 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Between 3–4 spelling,
grammar, and
punctuation errors are
present.
0 pts
Not Present
More than 4 spelling,
grammar, and
punctuation errors are
present.
5 pts
Replies:
APA Format
and
Spelling/
Grammer
5 to >4.0 pts
Advanced
All in-text citations
and references are
typed in APA format.
Zero errors are
present. Correct
spelling, grammar,
and punctuation are
used.
4 to >3.0 pts
Proficient
Between 1 – 2 APA
formatting errors are
present. Between 1 –
2 spelling, grammar,
and punctuation
errors are present.
3 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Between 3 – 4 APA
formatting errors are
present. Between 3 –
4 spelling, grammar,
and punctuation
errors are present.
0 pts
Not Present
More than 4 APA
formatting errors are
present, or APA
format was not
followed. More than 4
spelling, grammar,
and punctuation
errors are present.
5 pts
Replies:
Word Count
3 to >2.0 pts
Advanced
The reply is at least
250 original words in
length.
2 to >1.0 pts
Proficient
The reply is at least
225 original words in
length.
1 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The reply is at least
200 original words in
length.
0 pts
Not Present
The reply is less than
200 original words in
length.
3 pts
Total Points: 80
Discussion Grading Rubric | BUSI644_B02_202320
Select your paper details and see how much our professional writing services will cost.
Our custom human-written papers from top essay writers are always free from plagiarism.
Your data and payment info stay secured every time you get our help from an essay writer.
Your money is safe with us. If your plans change, you can get it sent back to your card.
We offer more than just hand-crafted papers customized for you. Here are more of our greatest perks.
Get instant answers to the questions that students ask most often.
See full FAQWe complete each paper from scratch, and in order to make you feel safe regarding its authenticity, we check our content for plagiarism before its delivery. To do that, we use our in-house software, which can find not only copy-pasted fragments, but even paraphrased pieces of text. Unlike popular plagiarism-detection systems, which are used by most universities (e.g. Turnitin.com), we do not report to any public databases—therefore, such checking is safe.
We provide a plagiarism-free guarantee that ensures your paper is always checked for its uniqueness. Please note that it is possible for a writing company to guarantee an absence of plagiarism against open Internet sources and a number of certain databases, but there is no technology (except for turnitin.com itself) that could guarantee no plagiarism against all sources that are indexed by turnitin. If you want to be 100% sure of your paper’s originality, we suggest you check it using the WriteCheck service from turnitin.com and send us the report.
Yes. You can have a free revision during 7 days after you’ve approved the paper. To apply for a free revision, please press the revision request button on your personal order page. You can also apply for another writer to make a revision of your paper, but in such a case, we can ask you for an additional 12 hours, as we might need some time to find another writer to work on your order.
After the 7-day period, free revisions become unavailable, and we will be able to propose only the paid option of a minor or major revision of your paper. These options are mentioned on your personal order page.