PPT presentation- Grading Rubric Miami Regional University- MSN5500
Dimension Competent Needs Improvement Unacceptable Introduction
40%
The topic is clear and concisely responds to the assigned/selected topic. The organization of the topic is appropriately ideas are outlined and implemented. Does not contain superfluous information.
40%
The approach is too broad or too narrow for the assigned/selected topic. The organization of the topic is difficult to follow and superficially implemented. Provides too much unnecessary information.
20%
Fails to present or respond to the assigned/selected topic. Organization of topic is missing, vague, or not consistently maintained.
0% Body of presentation
40%
All main points are well-developed; directly related to the topic. Supporting examples are concrete and detailed. There is a logical flow to the topics/arguments.
40%
Most main points are present, but not consistently pertinent to the thesis. Supporting examples are unclear or missing.
20%
The main points are poorly developed or not pertinent to the thesis. Missing supporting examples.
0% Conclusion
5%
The conclusion is clearly stated, and connections to the research and position are clear and relevant. The underlying logic is explicit.
5%
The conclusion is unclear. Partially connected to the research. Significant errors in logic.
2.5%
The conclusion is unclear. Connections to research are incorrect/unclear, or just a repetition of the findings without explanation. Underlying logic has major flaws.
0% Research (literature review)
5%
The research selected is highly relevant to the topic, and is properly incorporated into the presentation. The evidence comes from a wide variety of valid sources; minimum “required” sources published within the last 5 years.
5%
Research is relevant to the topic, yet incomplete, vague, and/or is poorly incorporated into the body paragraphs. Unclear components. Some evidence does not come from valid sources: minimum “required” sources published within the last 5 years.
2.5%
The research selected is not relevant to the topic, and is not properly incorporated into the body paragraphs. The evidence seldom comes from valid sources: minimum “required” sources published within the last 5 years.
0% Writing/ Mechanics and Voice- over-PPT
Writing is clear and concise. Writing is fluid and free from spelling and grammatical errors. Terminology is clearly defined. Writing uses the appropriate voice (active/passive).
Writing often contains spelling and grammatical errors. Writing inconsistently switches voices (active/passive).
Slides are difficult to read – do not flow logically from one part to another. There are consistent spelling and/or grammatical errors; technical terms may not be defined or are poorly defined. Writing does not use appropriate voice
PPT presentation- Grading Rubric Miami Regional University- MSN5500
5%
Voice-over-PPT used -appropriate and well understood. APA formatting appropriate.
5%
Voice-over-PPT used – unclear and poor understood APA formatting appropriate.
2.5%
(active/passive). Voice-over-PPT not used. APA formatting inappropriate.
0%
References
5%
References are precisely listed in APA (6th Edition format). In-text citations are used correctly for all quotations and paraphrasing.
5%
References are listed in APA format with frequent errors. In-text citations are missing, or contain frequent errors.
2.5%
References are not listed in the correct APA format. In-text citations are missing. PLAGIARISM will be addressed as per MRU’s policy.
0%
Select your paper details and see how much our professional writing services will cost.
Our custom human-written papers from top essay writers are always free from plagiarism.
Your data and payment info stay secured every time you get our help from an essay writer.
Your money is safe with us. If your plans change, you can get it sent back to your card.
We offer more than just hand-crafted papers customized for you. Here are more of our greatest perks.
Get instant answers to the questions that students ask most often.
See full FAQWe complete each paper from scratch, and in order to make you feel safe regarding its authenticity, we check our content for plagiarism before its delivery. To do that, we use our in-house software, which can find not only copy-pasted fragments, but even paraphrased pieces of text. Unlike popular plagiarism-detection systems, which are used by most universities (e.g. Turnitin.com), we do not report to any public databases—therefore, such checking is safe.
We provide a plagiarism-free guarantee that ensures your paper is always checked for its uniqueness. Please note that it is possible for a writing company to guarantee an absence of plagiarism against open Internet sources and a number of certain databases, but there is no technology (except for turnitin.com itself) that could guarantee no plagiarism against all sources that are indexed by turnitin. If you want to be 100% sure of your paper’s originality, we suggest you check it using the WriteCheck service from turnitin.com and send us the report.
Yes. You can have a free revision during 7 days after you’ve approved the paper. To apply for a free revision, please press the revision request button on your personal order page. You can also apply for another writer to make a revision of your paper, but in such a case, we can ask you for an additional 12 hours, as we might need some time to find another writer to work on your order.
After the 7-day period, free revisions become unavailable, and we will be able to propose only the paid option of a minor or major revision of your paper. These options are mentioned on your personal order page.