MD4 Discussion

For this Discussion, you will use data to develop a specialization-specific scenario representing a need for change in your educational or community setting. (BASED ON Early Childhood Education)
Note: You will develop the scenario in this Discussion for your colleagues to respond to and address the scenario from your perspective in Module 4 Discussion 2.

Collapse Subdiscussion

Amanda Puryear

Amanda Puryear

Dec 28, 2022Dec 28, 2022 at 10:17am

Manage Discussion Entry

     According to Jayaratne (2016), the information needed for a high-quality formal evaluation stems from asking three basic questions: What are the positive factors of the program? What are the negative factors of the program? And what changes are needed for the program to improve? The following scenario seeks to analyze these questions. The Hearne ISD Gifted and Talented Education (GATE) program is in its second year of rebuilding from the COVID-19 pandemic. Pre-COVID, the program was lagging in the identifying and accommodation for gifted students; however, the COVID-19 shutdown and mismanagement drew the program almost non-existent. Now with a new program coordinator, the program is starting to make positive gains in identifying gifted students and providing a pullout program for them to experiment and engage in cross-curricular self-paced activities. However, a major issue still presents in the program is the lack of accommodations in the student’s general education classes. The source of this issue is the lack of gifted and talented training teachers. Out of the 71 teachers employed from k-12, only 14, 19%, have completed the gifted and talented training course. Breaking this data further, out of the 14 teachers with their training, only two, 14%,  are located on the elementary campus, which accounts for 35% of the total gifted population (A.Puryear, personal communication, December 26, 2022). The elementary campus is the most important grade level for providing gifted services and developing healthy habits in gifted students.

       This issue presents a need for change because if gifted and talented students are not stimulated in the classroom, they can be plagued with social and emotional problems and develop feelings of boredom in the classroom and a decrease in student achievement. This can lead to some very negative behavior or behavior that is perceived as being negative by the teacher and the outcomes that follow with the consequences of that negative behavior (Hile et al., 2022). To give the gifted and talented students of Hearne I.S.D the best social and educational enrichment that we could possibly give them, changes in the program need to take place. 

References 

Hile, O. M., Sorensen, T. J., & McKim, A. J. (2022). Meeting the needs of gifted and talented students in agricultural education: An exploratory study.

       Journal of Agricultural Education, 
63(1), 13–28. 

https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2022.01013
 Links to an external site.

. 

Jayaratne, K. S. U. (2016). T

ools for formative evaluation: Gathering the information necessary
 Links to an external site.

 for program improvement.
 Links to an external site.

Journal of Extension, 54(1),

       28. Retrieved from https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1930&context=joe

Katheryn Gonzales

Dec 29, 2022Dec 29, 2022 at 5:49pm

Manage Discussion Entry

            Change, at best, can be difficult. Fullan (2016) reminds us that there is no “silver bullet” for change, but instead, planning and implementation of assumptions made about how to make effective change. For example, the issue that has been widely discussed in my field of expertise that needs change is what some have called the “reading wars.” The reading wars are simply a dispute over how to teach reading. Some educators believe we should teach a systematic approach through phonics, while others believe in teaching whole language. The reading wars are an educational battle that is being fought in newspaper editorials, schools, state legislators, and congress. The reason this is such a hot topic is because of the decline we are seeing in reading test scores related to whole language instruction. Other scientific studies indicated that phonics-based instruction resulted in higher reading test scores. Whole language advocates want to blame socioeconomic levels and ethnographic studies for the decline in scores (Reyhner, 2020).

            This issue directly affects my practice as an early childhood kindergarten teacher because I teach young children how to read, and many schools are adopting new or old methods to do just that. The current scenario at my school involves teaching students phonics for 30 to 45 minutes a day and then following that up by teaching whole language guided reading instruction for the next hour and a half. Some teachers believe that teaching students to read using a systematic phonics curriculum is more effective than relying on the three-queuing system of what looks right, sounds right, and makes sense in guided reading. Education Week surveyed 670 K-2 special education teachers and 530 education professors who teach reading courses to evaluate teacher and teacher-educator knowledge and practice in the United States. This study followed up the latest reading report card that showed 35% of 4th graders are reading at a proficient level, with the achievement gap growing. The research also showed that 75% of teachers teaching reading use the three-queuing system. More than 25% of these teachers tell students to “look at the picture” when they come to a tricky word rather than to try and sound out the word. The research also looked at teacher education. The research shows that 33% of teachers learned how to teach reading through professional development, 17% learned from experience in the classroom, 15% said other, 14% stated curriculum, and so on.

            The issue needs to change because many teachers are not prepared to teach reading after college and learn through professional development or curriculum. Many districts and schools within districts are adopting different methods. Many teachers focus a small amount of the day on teaching phonics and then switch to using the three-queuing system. This approach is confusing to students and teachers. Educational reading reform is necessary to see the achievement gaps close in our country (Loewus, 2019).

 

References
:

Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Loewus, L. (2019, December 4). Data: How Reading Is Really Being Taught. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/data-how-reading-is-really-being-taught/2019/12

Reyhner, J. (2020, January 3). Reading Wars: Phonics vs. Whole Language. Jan.ucc.nau.edu. https://jan.ucc.nau.edu/~jar/Reading_Wars.html#:~:text=Reading%20Wars%2D%2DThe%20dispute

 ReplyReply to Comment

due Jan 11 at 10:00am

Module 4: Discussion 1

SCENARIOS FOR CHANGE

Consider the need for educational change facing the Grand City community and how members of the task force have begun working toward meeting that need. You have reviewed the data reflecting demographics for the community and reflected on how the data should inform decisions regarding changes to your specialization. While changes may be welcomed by some members in the community, as a leader of change, you must also take into account why some members resist change. Perhaps the issues facing Grand City are similar or reflective of the needs of your own community. How might you support your community in a change process? How might you encourage change-resistant community members to work toward necessary change?

For this Discussion, you will use data to develop a specialization-specific scenario representing a need for change in your educational or community setting. (BASED ON Early Childhood Education)

Note: You will develop the scenario in this Discussion for your colleagues to respond to and address the scenario from your perspective in Module 4 Discussion 2.

To prepare:

• Review the assigned Fullan (2016) chapters for this module. Consider the processes and concepts regarding change and how educational leaders can support both.

• In the City Hall location in Grand City, revisit the media of the task force’s opening meeting. Think about the issues addressed by the members represented and how communities strive to meet the educational requirements of their children/students and the needs of their members. Think about how the issues raised in the video and those by your colleagues thus far in the course resonate with your specialization in your own educational or community setting.

• Select an issue that represents a need for change in your educational or community setting and involves, or has the potential to involve, your specialization area. Locate and review the existing data related to this issue. What is the data telling you about the issue and potential educational and/or community changes?

Note: If you are unable to determine an issue from your own educational setting or find data related to your issue, you can select an issue and review the data provided in Grand City.

• Based on the data, develop a more detailed scenario of the issue for your Walden colleagues to respond to with evidence-based strategies for leading the change process.

Note: You may wish to base your scenario on a personal experience or on the information provided in Grand City.

ASSIGNMENT TASK PART 1

Write a scenario description that explains:

• The details of the issue, including the history of the problem, who is involved, and why the problem has occurred. Be sure to include specific reference to data to support your explanation.

• How the issue presents a need for change within your specialization in your educational or community setting.

For this Discussion, and all scholarly writing in this course and throughout your program, you will be required to use APA style and provide reference citations.

ASSIGNMENT TASK PART 2

Read a selection of your colleagues’ posts.

Respond to at least two of your colleagues in
150 word responses:

• explaining how you would address the issue they proposed using specific evidence-based strategies for leading the change process.

• Be sure to support your response with reference to the Learning Resources, research, and prior professional experiences.

MODULE 4: LEARNING RESOURCES

Required Readings

· Fullan, M. (2016).

The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

· Chapter 3, “Insights into the Change Process” (pp. 39–53)

· Chapter 5, “Planning, Doing, and Coping with Change” (pp. 82–96)

· Giancola, S. (2014). 

Evaluation matters: Getting the information you need from your evaluation
 Links to an external site.

. U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/oese/sst/evaluationmatters

· Jayaratne, K. S. U. (2016). T

ools for formative evaluation: Gathering the information necessary for program improvement.
 Links to an external site.

 
Journal of Extension, 54(1), 28. Retrieved from https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1930&context=joe

· Henson, H. (2016). 

Data quality evaluation for program evaluators
 Links to an external site.

. 
Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 21(1), 99-108. doi:10.3138/cjpe.261

· Document: 

Action Plan Template 1

 Download Action Plan Template 1

(Word document)

· Document: 

Action Plan Template 2

 Download Action Plan Template 2

(Word document)

Required Media

· Grand City Community

Go to the 

Grand City Community
 Links to an external site.

and click into City Hall to review the following for this module:

· Walden University, LLC. (Producer). (2017a). 
Grand City opening task force meeting [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

· Walden University, LLC. (Producer). (2016b). 
Grand City education and demographic data files [PDF]. Baltimore, MD: Author.