WK 8 ASSGN
WK 8 ASSIGNMENT AND RUBRIC ATTACHED Due 1/22/23 by 11:59 EST
NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric
| NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric | ||||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following:· Properly identify 4 peer-reviewed research articles you reviewed. |
20 to >17.0 pts Excellent The response identifies 4 peer-reviewed research articles for the Assignment. 17 to >15.0 pts Good The response identifies 3 peer-reviewed research articles and one peer-reviewed article for the Assignment. 15 to >13.0 pts Fair The response identifies 4 or less peer-reviewed articles 13 to >0 pts Poor The response identifies less than 4 peer-reviewed articles or peer-reviewed articles are missing |
20 pts |
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples. |
40 to >35.0 pts Excellent The response accurately and thoroughly summarizes in detail each study reviewed, explaining in detail the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described….Specific, accurate, and detailed examples are provided which fully support the response. 35 to >31.0 pts Good The response summarizes each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described….Accurate examples are provided which support the response provided. 31 to >27.0 pts Fair The response is missing one or two of the required elements or summaries are superficially addressed. 27 to >0 pts Poor The response is missing three or more required elements or the summaries are superficially addressed. |
40 pts |
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles in a cohesive conclusion. |
25 to >22.0 pts Excellent Response includes a synthesis of the findings in an exceptionally well-written conclusion. 22 to >19.0 pts Good Response includes a synthesis of the findings in a well-written conclusion. 19 to >17.0 pts Fair The response is missing a synthesis of the findings or the conclusion is superficial. 17 to >0 pts Poor The response is missing a synthesis of the findings and the conclusion is not accurate or is missing. |
2 5 pts |
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. |
5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. 4 to >3.0 pts Good Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. 3 to >2.0 pts Fair Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. 2 to >0 pts Poor Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. |
5 pts | ||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation |
5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4 to >3.0 pts Good Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3 to >2.0 pts Fair Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 2 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
|||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – APA:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. |
5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Uses correct APA format with no errors. 4 to >3.0 pts Good Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. 3 to >2.0 pts Fair Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. 2 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. |
WK 8 ASSIGNMENT Due 1/21/23
LITERATURE REVIEW: THE USE OF CLINICAL SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE OUTCOMES AND EFFICIENCIES
New technology—and the application of existing technology—only appears in healthcare settings after careful and significant research. The stakes are high, and new clinical systems need to offer evidence of positive impact on outcomes or efficiencies.
Nurse informaticists and healthcare leaders formulate clinical system strategies. As these strategies are often based on technology trends, informaticists and others have then benefited from consulting existing research to inform their thinking.
In this Assignment, you will review existing research focused on the application of clinical systems. After reviewing, you will summarize your findings.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES
To Prepare:
· Review the Resources and reflect on the impact of clinical systems on outcomes and efficiencies within the context of nursing practice and healthcare delivery.
· Conduct a search for recent (within the last 5 years) research focused on the application of clinical systems. The research should provide evidence to support the use of one type of clinical system to improve outcomes and/or efficiencies, such as “the use of personal health records or portals to support patients newly diagnosed with diabetes.”
· Identify and select 4 peer-reviewed research articles from your research.
· For information about annotated bibliographies, visit
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/annotatedbibliographiesLinks to an external site.
The Assignment: (4-5 pages not including the title and reference page)
In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following:
· Identify the 4 peer-reviewed research articles you reviewed, citing each in APA format.
· Include an introduction explaining the purpose of the paper.
· Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples.
· In your conclusion, synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles.
· Use APA format and include a title page.
· Use the Safe Assign Drafts to check your match percentage before submitting your work.
RESOURCES:
· McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2022).
Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
· Chapter 14, “The Electronic Health Record and Clinical Informatics” (pp. 293–316)
· Chapter 15, “Informatics Tools to Promote Patient Safety, Quality Outcomes, and Interdisciplinary Collaboration” (pp. 323–349)
· Chapter 16, “Patient Engagement and Connected Health” (pp. 357–378)
· Chapter 17, “Using Informatics to Promote Community/Population Health” (pp. 383–397)
· Chapter 18, “Telenursing and Remote Access Telehealth” (pp. 403–432)
· Dykes, P. C., Rozenblum, R., Dalal, A., Massaro, A., Chang, F., Clements, M., Collins, S. …Bates, D. W. (2017).
Prospective evaluation of a multifaceted intervention to improve outcomes in intensive care: The Promoting Respect and Ongoing Safety Through Patient Engagement Communication and Technology Study
Download Prospective evaluation of a multifaceted intervention to improve outcomes in intensive care: The Promoting Respect and Ongoing Safety Through Patient Engagement Communication and Technology Study
.
Critical Care Medicine, 45(8), e806–e813. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000002449
· HealthIT.gov. (2018c).
What is an electronic health record (EHR)
? Links to an external site.
Retrieved from
https://www.healthit.gov/faq/what-electronic-health-record-ehr
· Rao-Gupta, S., Kruger, D. Leak, L. D., Tieman, L. A., & Manworren, R. C. B. (2018).
Leveraging interactive patient care technology to Improve pain management engagement Links to an external site.
.
Pain Management Nursing, 19(3), 212–221.
· Skiba, D. (2017).
Evaluation tools to appraise social media and mobile applications Links to an external site.
.
Informatics, 4(3), 32–40.
· Walden University, LLC. (Producer). (2018).
Public Health Informatics [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Calculate the price of your order
Select your paper details and see how much our professional writing services will cost.
- Freebies
- Format
- Formatting (MLA, APA, Chicago, custom, etc.)
- Title page & bibliography
- 24/7 customer support
- Amendments to your paper when they are needed
- Chat with your writer
- 275 word/double-spaced page
- 12 point Arial/Times New Roman
- Double, single, and custom spacing
-
We care about originality
Our custom human-written papers from top essay writers are always free from plagiarism.
-
We protect your privacy
Your data and payment info stay secured every time you get our help from an essay writer.
-
You control your money
Your money is safe with us. If your plans change, you can get it sent back to your card.
How it works
-
1
You give us the detailsComplete a brief order form to tell us what kind of paper you need.
-
2
We find you a top writerOne of the best experts in your discipline starts working on your essay.
-
3
You get the paper doneEnjoy writing that meets your demands and high academic standards!
Get your own paper from top experts
Order nowPerks of our essay writing service
We offer more than just hand-crafted papers customized for you. Here are more of our greatest perks.
Frequently asked questions
Get instant answers to the questions that students ask most often.
See full FAQIs there a possibility of plagiarism in my completed order?
We complete each paper from scratch, and in order to make you feel safe regarding its authenticity, we check our content for plagiarism before its delivery. To do that, we use our in-house software, which can find not only copy-pasted fragments, but even paraphrased pieces of text. Unlike popular plagiarism-detection systems, which are used by most universities (e.g. Turnitin.com), we do not report to any public databases—therefore, such checking is safe.
We provide a plagiarism-free guarantee that ensures your paper is always checked for its uniqueness. Please note that it is possible for a writing company to guarantee an absence of plagiarism against open Internet sources and a number of certain databases, but there is no technology (except for turnitin.com itself) that could guarantee no plagiarism against all sources that are indexed by turnitin. If you want to be 100% sure of your paper’s originality, we suggest you check it using the WriteCheck service from turnitin.com and send us the report.
I received some comments from my teacher. Can you help me with them?
Yes. You can have a free revision during 7 days after you’ve approved the paper. To apply for a free revision, please press the revision request button on your personal order page. You can also apply for another writer to make a revision of your paper, but in such a case, we can ask you for an additional 12 hours, as we might need some time to find another writer to work on your order.
After the 7-day period, free revisions become unavailable, and we will be able to propose only the paid option of a minor or major revision of your paper. These options are mentioned on your personal order page.
How will I receive a completed paper?
You will get the first version of your paper in a non-editable PDF format within the deadline. You are welcome to check it and inform us if any changes are needed. If everything is okay, and no amendments are necessary, you can approve the order and download the .doc file. If there are any issues you want to change, you can apply for a free revision and the writer will amend the paper according to your instructions. If there happen to be any problems with downloading your paper, please contact our support team.Where do I upload files?
When you submit your first order, you get a personal account where you can track all your orders, their statuses, your payments, and discounts. Among other options, you will have a possibility to communicate with your writer via a special messenger. You will be able to upload all information and additional materials on your paper using the “Files” tab on your personal page. Please consider uploading everything you find necessary for our writer to perform at the highest standard.